Comparison of Single-Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy and Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

Purpose: To compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes of single-port robotic donor nephrectomies (SP RDNs) and laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (LDNs). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for patients who received LDN or SP RDN between September 2020 and December 2022. Donor baseline characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and recipient renal function were extracted and compared between LDN and SP RDN. SP RDN learning curve analysis based on operative time and graft extraction time was performed using cumulative sum analysis. Results: One hundred forty-four patients underwent LDN and 32 patients underwent SP RDN. LDN and SP RDN had similar operative times (LDN: 190.3 ± 28.0 minutes, SP RDN: 194.5 ± 35.1 minutes, p = 0.3253). SP RDN patients had significantly greater extraction times (LDN: 83.2 ± 40.3 seconds, SP RDN: 204.1 ± 52.2 seconds, p < 0.0001) and warm ischemia times (LDN: 145.1 ± 61.7 seconds, SP RDN: 275.4 ± 65.6 seconds, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in patient subjective pain scores, inpatient opioid usage, or Clavien-Dindo II+ complications. Short- and medium-term postoperative donor and recipient renal function were also similar between the groups. SP RDN graft extraction time and total operative time learning curves were achieved at case 27 and 13, respectively. Conclusion: SP RDN is a safe and feasible alternative to LDN that minimizes postoperative abdominal incisional scars and has a short learning curve. Future randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the findings of this study and to identify other potential benefits and drawbacks of SP RDNs.

Infections After Adoption of Antibiogram-directed Prophylaxis and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion for Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has significantly decreased the morbidity associated with radical cystectomy. However, infectious complications including sepsis, urinary tract (UTIs), wound (WIs), and intra-abdominal (AIs) infections remain common. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and antibiogram-directed antimicrobial prophylaxis would decrease infections after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing RARC between 2014 and 2022 at a tertiary care institution, identifying two groups based on adherence to a prospectively implemented modified ERAS protocol for RARC: modified-ERAS-ICUD and antibiogram-directed ampicillin-sulbactam, gentamicin, and fluconazole prophylaxis were utilized (from January 2019 to present time), and unmodified-ERAS-extracorporeal urinary diversion (UD) and guideline-recommended cephalosporin-based prophylaxis regimen were utilized (from November 2014 to June 2018). Patients receiving other prophylaxis regimens were excluded. INTERVENTION: ICUD and antibiogram-directed infectious prophylaxis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was UTIs within 30 and 90 d postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were WIs, AIs, and sepsis within 30 and 90 d postoperatively, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) within 90 d postoperatively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 396 patients were studied (modified-ERAS: 258 [65.2%], unmodified-ERAS: 138 [34.8%]). UD via a neobladder was more common in the modified-ERAS cohort; all other intercohort demographic differences were not statistically different. Comparing cohorts, modified-ERAS had significantly reduced rates of 30-d (7.8% vs 15.9%, p = 0.027) and 90-d UTIs (11.2% vs 25.4%, p = 0.001), and 30-d WIs (1.2% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001); neither group had a WI after 30 d. Rates of AIs, sepsis, and CDI did not differ between groups. On multivariate regression, the modified-ERAS protocol correlated with a reduced risk of UTIs and WIs (all p < 0.01). The primary limitation is the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of ICUD and antibiogram-based prophylaxis correlates with significantly decreased UTIs and WIs after RARC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study of infections after robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, we found that intracorporeal (performed entirely inside the body) urinary diversion and an institution-specific antibiogram-directed antibiotic prophylaxis regimen led to fewer urinary tract infections and wound infections at our institution.

Clinical and treatment characteristics of secondary bladder malignancies following low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To characterize the clinical course and prognosis of bladder malignancies associated with prior prostate brachytherapy SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried our institutional database for patients with bladder cancer (BC) diagnosed between January 2005 and April 2019 who had previously undergone low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy. Patients diagnosed with BC at least 1 year following LDR prostate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy were included. Clinical and disease-specific characteristics were abstracted from chart review and survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. We compared the pathologic characteristics and prognosis of secondary BCs in our study cohort to those of BCs diagnosed after prostate cancer managed without radiation reported by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) populational database from 2005 to 2018. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-five patients were identified with combined diagnosis of prostate cancer and BC, 51 of whom met inclusion criteria in the study cohort. Median times from brachytherapy to BC diagnosis for the study and SEER cohort were 9.5 ± 4.5 and 6.3 ± 4.1 years, respectively. Compared to the SEER cohort, significantly greater proportion of BC from the study cohort presented with high-grade (study: 78.4%, SEER: 52.3%, P = 0.0008) and with MIBC (Study BC 35.3%, SEER BC: 17.5%, P = 0.0009). The study and the SEER cohort had similar 5-year overall survival (study: 67.9%, SEER: 58.0%, P = 0.1099), and 5-year cancer-specific survival (study: 81.0%, SEER: 82.8%, P = 0.5559). The 5-year progression-free survival for the study cohort was 43.7% (95% CI: 28.8-57.7). CONCLUSION: Compared to bladder cancers following prostate cancer managed without radiation, bladder malignancies following prostate LDR brachytherapy present with higher grade and are more likely to be muscle invasive. Despite the aggressive presenting features of postprostate brachytherapy BC, there were no differences in overall and cancer-specific survival between the groups.

Medium-Term Real-World Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (Rezum) vs Prostatic Urethral Lift (UroLift) in a High-Volume Urban Academic Center.

Purpose: Water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT, i.e., Rezum®) and prostatic urethral lift (PUL, i.e., Urolift®) are minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Few studies have directly compared the two procedures. We examined the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing WVTT and PUL at our high-volume urban academic center. Methods: We reviewed our institutional MIST database to identify patients with prostate sizes ≥30 and ≤80 cc who underwent WVTT or PUL for treatment of BPH between January 2017 and September 2021. Pre- and postoperative outcomes, including retreatment rates, American Urological Association symptom score (AUA-SS), maximum flow (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), medication usage, trial of void success rates, catheterization requirements, and postoperative complications within 90 days were extracted and compared between procedures. Results: Three hundred seven patients received WVTT and 110 patients received PUL with average follow-up times of 11.3 and 12.8 months, respectively. WVTT patients showed significant improvements in AUA-SS, Qmax, and PVR, whereas PUL patients showed improvements in only AUA-SS and Qmax. Both WVTT and PUL patients with longitudinal follow-up demonstrated improvements in AUA-SS, Qmax, and PVR. Postoperatively, alpha-blocker utilization was significantly decreased following both WVTT and PUL (WVTT: 73.9%-46.6%, PUL: 76.4%-38.2%, both p < 0.001). Compared to patients receiving PUL, WVTT patients more frequently reported postoperative dysuria (22.8% vs 8.3%, p = 0.001) and nonclot-related retention (18.9% vs 7.3%, p = 0.005); PUL patients more frequently experienced postoperative clot retention (7.3% vs 2.6%, p = 0.027). There were no differences in rates of postoperative bladder spasm, trial of void success, urinary tract infections, or emergency department visits. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation were rare and occurred at similar rates. Conclusion: In the real-world setting, WVTT and PUL have similar medium-term efficacy in improving symptoms and decreasing medication utilization for patients with BPH. Differences in postoperative complication profiles should inform patient counseling.

The Utilization and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After Transurethral Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: A Case-Control, Matched Analysis of a National Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the utilization and safety of same-day (SDD) vs standard-length discharge (SLD) for transurethral resection (TURP), holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP), and GreenLight photovaporization (GL-PVP) of the prostate. METHODS: Using the 2015-2019 ACS-NSQIP files, the annual proportion of TURP, HoLEP, and GL-PVP performed with SDD (length of stay [LOS] = 0 days) was calculated. Patients were stratified by LOS into SDD and SLD (TURP: LOS = 1-3 days, HoLEP and GL-PVP: LOS = 1-2 days); those with longer LOS were excluded. Patients were matched 1:1 by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index score. We compared 30-day unplanned readmissions, reoperations, and Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications between SLD and SDD, and evaluated predictors of adverse outcomes using logistic regression. RESULTS: Most GL-PVP patients underwent SDD, compared to a minority of TURP and HoLEP patients. SDD utilization increased, remained stable, and decreased over time for HoLEP, TURP, and GL-PVP, respectively. For 46,898 included cases (31,872 TURP, 2,901 HoLEP, 12,125 GL-PVP), rates of reoperation, CD I/II, or CD IV complications were comparable before and after matching. Compared to SLD, 30-day unplanned readmission rates for matched SDD patients were lower following TURP (3.48% vs 4.25%, P = .013) and HoLEP (1.93% vs 4.43%, P = .003). On multivariate regression, SLD correlated with unplanned readmission after TURP and HoLEP for both unmatched and matched cohorts. CONCLUSION: For appropriately selected patients, SDD after TURP, HoLEP, and GL-PVP did not confer increased risk of 30-day complications, suggesting patient selection for SDD is being done with appropriate safety nationally.

Adrenalectomy outcomes predicted by a 5-item frailty index (5-iFI) in the ACS-NSQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Frailty has been shown to be a predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes. This study aims to evaluate a 5-item frailty index (5-iFI) as a predictor of complications as well as healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) following adrenalectomy. METHODS: All adrenalectomy cases recorded in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2015 to 2018 were analyzed. Primary outcomes of interest were Clavien-Dindo [CD] I/II or CD IV complications and HCRU. HCRU outcomes were prolonged length of stay (PLOS), discharge to continued care (DCC), and unplanned 30-day readmission (UR). RESULTS: 4358 patients were included. Higher 5-iFI scores were associated with higher rates of CDI/II, CDIV, and increased HCRU (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, 5-iFI scores were found to be independent predictors of adverse clinical and HCRU outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty tools like the 5i-FI can be useful in preoperative risk-benefit analysis, patient counseling, and planning prehabilitation interventions.

A Comparison of Pharmaceutical Prices for Generic Erectile Dysfunction and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Medication in 2 Socioeconomically Disparate New York City Neighborhoods.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are frequently managed with medications. Variability and poor understanding of medication prices have been shown to hinder patient adherence, leading to worse clinical outcomes. We sought to explore how pharmacy type and neighborhood socioeconomic status influence pricing for generic ED and BPH medications. METHODS: A total of 96 pharmacies within the adjacent higher income Upper East Side (UES) and lower income East Harlem (EH) New York City neighborhoods were classified as chain or independent. Telephone surveys identified cash prices for 30-day supplies of 14 medications including phosphodiesterase 5-inhibitors, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, alpha blockers and antispasmodics. Pricing variability based on pharmacy type and neighborhood was evaluated using Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: Of 96 pharmacies, 81 responded (84.4%). Independent pharmacies showed significantly reduced prices for 9/14 and 14/14 medications in UES and EH, respectively. The greatest independent pharmacy price reductions were for tadalafil 20 mg (15.0-fold in UES, 26.7-fold in EH) and sildenafil (8.4-fold in UES, 15.4-fold in EH). The least significant reductions were in mirabegron (1.1-fold in UES, 1.2-fold in EH). Independent pharmacies in EH showed lower prices for 9/14 medications compared to those in UES. CONCLUSIONS: Across both neighborhoods, independent pharmacies offered consistently lower cash prices for ED and BPH medications. Lower independent pharmacy prices in the lower income EH neighborhood suggest that neighborhood socioeconomic status may impact pricing. Physicians and patients alike must understand the factors that influence pricing to ensure more optimal patient compliance for uninsured patients.

Robotic Single-Port Donor Nephrectomy with the da Vinci SP® Surgical System.

OBJECTIVES: The da Vinci SP® Surgical System received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for urological procedures in 2018. Here, we describe the first experience performing single-port robot-assisted donor nephrectomy (RADN) using the da Vinci SP® surgical system, present 90-day clinical outcomes, and discuss tips for operative success. METHODS: Seven consecutive patients underwent single-port RADN at a single institution between September 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Surgery was performed through a single, 60 mm Pfannenstiel incision with a 12 mm periumbilical assistant port for suction and vascular stapling. Donor characteristics, operative details, 90-day donor clinical outcomes, and recipient renal function were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Four female and three male patients successfully underwent single-port RADN without conversion to standard multiport or open approach. Six cases were left-sided. Estimated blood loss for each procedure was ≤ 50 mL. Mean operative time, warm ischemia time, and extraction time were 218.3 minutes (standard deviation [SD]: 16.3 minutes), 5 minutes 4 seconds (SD: 56 seconds), and 3 minutes 37 seconds (SD: 38 seconds). Mean pre-operative creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 0.79 mg/dL and 107.3 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. At six week's follow up, they were 1.22 mg/dL and 66.1 mL/min/1.73m2. Average pain score at 48 hours postoperatively was 1.7/10. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications within 90 days. All recipients experienced immediate and sustained return of renal function post-transplant. CONCLUSION: Single-port RADN is a technically feasible and safe procedure with the da Vinci SP® system and can confer acceptable functional and cosmetic outcomes. Future studies are needed to define long-term outcomes and compare with previously established techniques for donor nephrectomy.

Rezum therapy for patients with large prostates (≥ 80 g): initial clinical experience and postoperative outcomes.

PURPOSE: Rezum is a minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Current guidelines recommend Rezum for prostates < 80 cc, but little data exist describing outcomes in patients with prostates ≥ 80 cc. We compare outcomes after Rezum between men with small < 80 cc (SP) and large ≥ 80 cc prostates (LP). METHODS: Patients undergoing Rezum between Jan 2017-Feb 2020 were subdivided by prostate volume (< 80, ≥ 80 cc). Outcomes were documented pre- and postoperatively. Descriptive analyses of urodynamics data (Qmax, PVR), symptom scores (AUA-SS, SHIM), disease management (medications, catheterization, retreatments), and clinical outcomes were conducted. RESULTS: 36 (17.6%) men had prostates ≥ 80 cc (LP mean prostate size 106.8 cc). LP men had improved Qmax and PVR postoperatively; those with longitudinal follow-up exhibited improved Qmax, PVR, and AUA-SS. After one year, alpha-blocker usage decreased significantly (LP 94.44-61.11%, p = 0.001, SP 73.96-46.15%, p = 0.001); other medication usage and self-catheterization rates remained unchanged. Compared to SP patients, differences in passing trial void (LP 94.44%, SP 93.45%), postoperative UTI (LP 19.44%, SP 10.12%), ED visits (LP 22.22%, SP 17.86%), readmissions (LP 8.33%, SP 4.76%), and retreatment (LP 8.33%, SP 4.76%) were insignificant. However, mean days to foley removal (LP 9, SP 5.71, p = 0.003) and urosepsis rates (LP 5.56%, SP 0.00%, p = 0.002) differed. CONCLUSION: In select LP patients, Rezum provided short-term symptomatic relief and improved voiding function comparable to SP patients. Postoperatively, though alpha-blocker usage decreased significantly, use of other medications did not change, and nearly two-thirds of patients still needed alpha-blockade. Further efforts should explore the possibility of expanding Rezum's inclusion criteria.

Implementation of a nonopioid protocol following robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.

PURPOSE: The implementation of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) for management of patients with muscle-invasive or high-risk noninvasive bladder cancer has increased in utilization over the last decade. Here, we seek to describe institutional opioid prescription and utilization patterns following implementation of a nonopioid (NOP) perioperative pain management protocol in patients who received RARC with ICUD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of all patients who underwent RARC that utilized a NOP perioperative pain management protocol at a single academic institution from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. For comparison, we included 74 consecutive patients who received the same NOP protocol with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients who received ICUD were included in our analysis. The median operation time for the ICUD group was 305 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 262-352). 12.1% (n = 14) of patients who underwent ICUD required narcotics during inpatient hospitalization. For these patients, the median morphine milligram equivalent requirement was 52.0 (IQR: 7.62-157). Additionally, only 12.1% (n = 14) of patients were prescribed opioids postoperatively at discharge. We identified that within 6 months of surgery only 5 (4.3%) patients required a second narcotic prescription. Furthermore, of patients who did not use mu-opioid blockers, a minority experienced postoperative ileus (15.7%, n = 16). 30- and 90-day all Clavien complication rates for patients were 44.8% (n = 52) and 49.1% (n = 57), respectively. Nineteen (16.4%) patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, of which none were pain related. When compared to ECUD, patients who received ICUD experienced similar complication and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a NOP protocol for patients undergoing RARC with ICUD allows for both decreased postoperative narcotic use and reduced need for narcotic prescriptions at discharge with acceptable complication and readmission rates.

Disposable versus Reusable Cystoscopes: A Micro-Costing Value Analysis in High-Volume and Low-Volume Urology Practices.

INTRODUCTION: Disposable single-use cystoscopes have become increasingly available, demonstrating comparable quality to reusable cystoscopes while eliminating the need for reprocessing and repairs. However, high costs remain a concern. To clarify the role for these scopes, we performed a cost analysis comparison between the single-use Ambu® aScope™ 4 cystoscope and reusable Olympus® CYF-VHR and V2 cystoscopes in 2 clinical settings: a high-volume multi-provider practice and low-volume single-provider practice. METHODS: The number of cystoscopies at each center was recorded between January and December 2019. Elements in the micro-costing analysis included the original purchasing price of the cystoscopes plus accessory equipment, sterilization supplies, repair costs, and personnel. Costs were amortized over 5 or 10 years and calculated on a per-case basis. An annual total cost analysis was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of each device for each facility. RESULTS: In 2019, 1,984 and 245 cystoscopic procedures were performed at the high and low-volume clinics, respectively. At the high-volume multi-provider practice, per-case cost for reusable cystoscopy amounted to $65.98 compared to $227.18 for single-use cystoscopy, with reusable equipment more cost-effective after 294 cystoscopies. At the low-volume single-provider practice, the per-case cost for reusable cystoscopy was $232.62 compared to $461.18 for single-use cystoscopy, with reusable equipment more cost-effective after 19 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this micro-costing analysis, per-case costs favor reusable cystoscopes. While single-use cystoscope pricing may be prohibitive for large and small facilities at this present time, these instruments are powerful adjuncts to urologists' armamentaria when portability and efficiency are prioritized.

Are Medicare's Nursing Home Compare Ratings Accurate Predictors of 90-Day Complications, Readmission, and Bundle Cost for Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Nursing Home Compare (NHC) ratings, created and maintained by Medicare, are used by both hospitals and consumers to aid in the skilled nursing facility (SNF) selection process. To date, no studies have linked NHC ratings to actual episode-based outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether NHC ratings are valid predictors of 90-day complications, readmission, and bundle costs for patients discharged to an SNF after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: All SNF-discharged primary TJA cases in 2017 at a multihospital academic health system were queried. Demographic, psychosocial, and clinical variables were manually extracted from the health record. Medicare NHC ratings were then collected for each SNF. For patients in the Medicare bundle, postacute and total bundle cost was extracted from claims. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-eight patients were discharged to a total of 105 unique SNFs. In multivariate analysis, overall NHC rating was not predictive of 90-day readmission/major complications, >75th percentile postacute cost, or 90-day bundle cost exceeding the target price. SNF health inspection and quality measure ratings were also not predictive of 90-day readmission/major complications or bundle performance. A higher SNF staffing rating was independently associated with a decreased odds for >75th percentile 90-day postacute spend (odds ratio, 0.58; P = .01) and a 90-day bundle cost exceeding the target price (odds ratio = 0.69; P = .02) but was similarly not predictive of 90-day readmission/complications. CONCLUSION: Results of our study suggest that Medicare's NHC tool is not a useful predictor of 90-day costs, complications, or readmissions for SNFs within our health system.